X9B Checks and Back-office Operations Subcommittee – Project Status
Call for Experts
X9.144 Production Subpoena Orders Exchange
Project Description| This standard is currently being drafted by the X9B4 Legal Orders workgroup. In today’s environment, subpoenas are served in multiple formats by federal, state, and local government agencies and law firms. These documents are served via mail, email, fax, or physically served to the bank. When the bank receives the orders the process for responding and fulfilling the order is highly manual, time-consuming, and prone to errors, and there are limited areas where automation is applied. By creating a set of standards for electronic file formats for the different request types, benefits will be realized by both the subpoena requester and responder through automation.
Project Need| There is a growing volume of requests due to overall increases in regulatory and legal environment. Standards in this area will bring about the following benefits:
- Reduced errors;
- Improved quality of the process and resulting outputs;
- Improved tracking and management of service levels;
- Reduced operational costs (after initial investment; business case TBD);
- Improved records management; and
- Improved fulfillment time quicker results to the requester (images provided and fees collected).
Stakeholders| Most financial institutions and Agencies in the U.S. are stakeholders processing subpoena orders.
X9.144 is in the beginning stages of development and is working to complete a draft of the standard by the summer of 2021. In furtherance of this goal, X9.144 is seeking input from individuals with backgrounds in legal services, subpoena compliance, those with technical backgrounds, and those with extensive experience working through the entire life cycle of the standard drafting process.
To participate in the development of this standard contact us.
X9.100-160-1-201X Magnetic Ink Printing (MICR) Part 1: Placement and Location
This standard is being reviewed to make possible updates and to improve usability. Part 1 of this standard covers only design considerations that apply to placement and location of magnetic ink printing on checks, drafts, and other documents intended for automated processing among depository institutions. Contact us if your organization would be interested in participating in the development of this standard.
X9.100-181-201X TIFF Image Format for Image Exchange
X9.100-181 is in need of a few minor updates in terminology and alignment with industry practice. The terminology changes are to ensure relative terms are defined in this standard. Updates are also needed to Image Length and Image Width to align with industry expectations for interoperability. This standard defines specific TIFF fields and parameters for check image exchange and the allowable values for those parameters. This standard will only address the use of G4 bilevel image (black/white) compressions within the TIFF 6.0 structure. A least common denominator approach was used to identify the fields that everyone should read and the required or allowable values for these fields that everyone will be expected to support. To accomplish interoperability, some of the fields and values are more restrictive compared to what is being generated in today’s environment. Contact us if your organization would be interested in participating in the development of this standard.
X9.100-187-201x Electronic Exchange of Check and Image Data – Domestic
With the change to Reg CC in July 2018, language used in the standard published in 2016 needs to be updated to reduce confusion. Making changes to the 25 record, field 15 (Archive Type) could provide additional tracking/information on the check payment while not requiring changes to systems. The purpose of this standard is to provide the financial industry with a format necessary to perform electronic check exchange (ECE), with or without images. The format supports forward presentment, posting, return notification, and return requests, as well as existing customer information reporting products. The standard also supports multiple check clearing alternatives, e.g., bank-to-bank, bank-to-switch. Contact us if your organization would be interested in participating in the development of this standard.
X9.100-20 Parts 1, 2 and 3 Print & Test Specifications for Magnetic Ink Printing
Part 1 of this standard specifies the shape, dimensions, magnetic signal level, and tolerances for the E-13B characters which include ten numerals and four special symbols printed in magnetic ink and used for the purpose of character recognition. It describes the various known types of printing defects and other printing considerations, together with the tolerances permitted. Part 2 provides informative conformance testing requirements for the Part 1 specifications. Part 3 specifies the requirements for secondary reference documents and the test equipment for calibrating and maintaining their signal level. Contact us if your organization would be interested in participating in the development of this standard.
TR 52 Remotely Created Checks (RCC) Design and Usage Guide
Remotely Created Checks (RCC) are widely used for legitimate preauthorized payments. Many of these transactions do not follow check standard and design principals and result in creating a lot of exception processing. A technical report would provide RCC originators a single document to assist them in creating RCC items that will flow through the check clearing systems without exceptions. A technical report should also improve the visibility of RCC items as being legitimate payment instruments. Contact us if your organization would be interested in participating in the development of this standard.
ASC X9 TR 48-2018 Card-Not-Present (CNP) Fraud Mitigation in the United States
ANSI X9.124-2-2018 Financial Services – Symmetric Key Cryptography for the Financial Services Industry – Format
Preserving Encryption- Part 2: Key Stream with Counter Mode
ANSI X9.129-2017 (Version 01) Legal Order Exchange
ANSI X9.69-2017 Framework for Key Management Extensions